Martina. 22. Not everyone's cup of tea. Gay as a window, serial tv quoter, shameless fangirl, likes to learn more languages than she can speak.
Cerco solo di non farmi prendere dal panico, ecco.
"I can never read all the books I want; I can never be all the people I want and live all the lives I want. I can never train myself in all the skills I want. And why do I want? I want to live and feel all the shades, tones and variations of mental and physical experience possible in life. And I am horribly limited" -Sylvia Plath
So this is me. The one with the chair. Yes, I know I'm ridiculous.
“I’m in love with… us. And I know that’s weird, I know that’s not the way you’re supposed to feel about your friends, but… I don’t care. I love us!” AROACE NANCY BEING DEEPLY PLATONICALLY IN LOVE WITH THE PINK LADIES Y E S
Just finished watching Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies and i see so many people talking about “aromantic nancy” and like sure maybe but why have i seen no one talking about how this girl is autistic and just never learned how to mask.
Like girl picks up on 0 social cues, all she wants to talk about is her special interest (fashion), is brutally honest like she literally has a whole song about it
Jade… all I care about is you. And if you wanna come here, after we find Airk, to live, I would tag along. If that’s okay. ‘Cause I don’t wanna have any adventures unless they’re with you. I should’ve told you that sooner, you know? And for that, for everything, I’m so sorry. Alright, uh, what did you wanna say?
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
Loish made a statement I sincerely support, please read the whole publication if this is, hopefully, of some interest to you: “Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art.”
ALT
